Oh woe, it’s the end of the world again
It’s that time again. The end of civilisation as we know it, the death of intellectual pursuits…
A recent article remarks upon the shortening of our concentration span and ability to read. An essay in Atlantic Monthly tells the tale of the writer who can no longer immerse himself in long books or stories. He says the internet has reduced his ability for deep, long reading and understanding.
Really?
This is, apparently, a Sign of the Times, or rather of the perpetual Decline of Society, which has probably been fortold by curmudgeons since we started walking upright on the savannah and our tree-residing ancestors saw it as a symbol of the declining standards of education. Everybody knows if you can walk upright you stand no chance against a hungry lion, out there on the savannah.
But is it really true? Are Wikipedia, Google and Twitter making us stupid, incapable of digesting large pieces of information, constructing long-form narrative or sitting back and reading a book?
I think not. And I think not in the month of November, which is Nanowrimo. Everybody is currently constructing stories. They will be 50,000 words long, which is about the length of a short doctoral thesis. That doesn’t sound like the death of story-telling to me.
And neither does the rise of Twitter. I spend a lot of time on Twitter, but that hasn’t stopped me being more than capable of digesting in the last two weeks alone, a book by Joachim C. Fest, the memoirs of Traudl Junge and a nine hundred page tome on the history of the Third Reich.
Besides which, there is a potential for a great deal of beauty, wit and talent to be conveyed in very short stories. Twitter requires a degree of skill, because the majority of users still stick to full English rather than text-speak, so you need to be able to say what you want to say in a space of 140 characters, make it appealing, inventive and expressive of yourself all at once.
Let us also not forget the bet Hemingway once made to tell what is a poignant and lucid story in only six words: “For sale: baby shoes. Never worn.”
No longer piece could convey with such clarity an entire story, read between the lines, but only requiring six words. Anything more might be mawkishly melodramatic. Do we need to know any more? Isn’t there enough sadness and loss presented in the sale of a pair of baby shoes, bought but never required?
It points, I think, not to the death of reading, of long stories, or people’s ability to read books (I’m sure all my readers will be happy to comment that they can still read a book quite happily), but to the general tendency of people to hook themselves on the Terrible Decline of Society. Go back far enough and priests and elites struggled with the idea that the general populace should be capable of reading and writing at all, because it might start them off on the dangerous business of thinking for themselves.
In past times, people decried the advent of printed books over the handwritten variety, lamented the right of people of all types in society to vote, and a whole host of other events which marked changes or turning points in society. We always tend to see change as the end of the world. I can happily tweet away whilst writing 1000 word articles, 180,000 word books and read as much as I want. There is nothing more delicious than the pleasure of reading, of an entire Sunday spent doing nothing but that, fueled by a constant supply of hot tea.
If people struggle to read it’s probably less about having a limited attention span but attempting to fit everything into a 24 hour day. Since we live now in a 24 hour world, it’s not uncommon for me to find agents demanding to know why I wasn’t answering my phone at 9pm to their “urgent” call. We try to do too much, perhaps, and certain activities, like reading, tend to be cast as laziness. If we’re not doing six billion things at once whilst running on the treadmill and arranging meetings with accountants and tweeting the whole thing ad infinitum, we’re just not productive enough!
I’ve taken to withdrawing each weekend with a book. Not to ensure that I can still read, but to cement the idea that there are times when I’m not online, when I’m not available, when I won’t answer the phone even. When it comes down to it, maintaining what we want to be able to do in society depends on withstanding the flow and the pressure from outside. If you find yourself bleating that you have to have your phone with you all night because somebody important might call about something crucial, remember that you’re not a sheep, and if you aren’t actually the president of a large country, nothing with the exception of a death in the family could possibly be so urgent.
Reports of the death of civilisation thanks to the digital squirrel* that is Google, or Twitter, are probably very much exaggerated. And if you’re still capable of writing very long articles about your inability to read very long articles, you’re missing something vital, and obvious.



